Built for Corporate Development

Anthropic ships breadth. OloLand ships depth.

When the board asks “how will this integration actually work?” — OloLand answers with deterministic synergy math, forensic QoE on the target, and the integration playbook from your last three tuck-ins.

Board-defensible memo
170+ MCP tools for your team
Methodology disclosed
Why / What / How

Three layers. One memo your board can defend.

OloLand is the depth layer for corporate development — the verifier stack and persistent deal record that turns strategic context into a memo the board can defend and a synergy number the CFO can measure post-close.

Why
The artifact the board asks for

A board-defensible M&A memo.

Not a chat transcript. Not a banker pitchbook. The terminal artifact your CEO walks into the board meeting with — synergy detail by bucket, integration risk quantified, post-close measurement plan attached. Source-linked numbers, ledgered assumptions, and evidence-linked claims the board can audit line by line.

What
The category we define

A verifiable intelligence layer.

Hebbia and AlphaSense are intelligence layers — better search over your deal room. Verifiable intelligence is a different category: source hierarchy surfaces contradictions across CPA, tax, management, and AI evidence; generated outputs preserve source-page citations; uncited claims and unsupported high-priority assumptions stay out of the memo. Bankers can’t see your roadmap. You don’t have to give it to them.

How
The mechanism Claude doesn’t ship

Deterministic engines and a persistent deal record.

Deterministic synergy modeling (revenue + cost). Forensic QoE primitives on the target (Beneish, Benford, EBITDA bridge, working-capital anomalies). A persistent record across the corp dev funnel — sourcing, pipeline, close, integration, post-mortem — so the lessons from tuck-in #3 show up on tuck-in #4. Claude doesn’t ship those. We do, and they compound across your M&A history.

Board

Defensible memo

Synergy math + integration risk + post-close measurement plan

300+

Leaf-level risk checks

Integration-relevant exposures, severity-scored

41

MCP tools

Plugin in Claude Code, Desktop, Cursor

Persistent

Corp dev record

Sourcing → close → integration → post-mortem

Corp Dev Math

The board scrutinizes every deal. Bring receipts.

Corp dev VPs, M&A heads, and strategic-acquirer CFOs share one problem: every synergy claim has to survive post-close measurement, and every integration risk you didn’t flag in diligence becomes a write-down on the call. You can’t outsource this to the banker — the strategic context is proprietary.

Defensible synergy math

Synergy claims must survive post-close measurement.

Deterministic synergy modeling — revenue and cost — with every assumption ledgered and line items linked to their sources. The number you put in the board deck is the same number the CFO will be asked to defend on the Q+4 earnings call.

300+ leaf-level checks

Integration risk is the difference between accretive and dilutive.

The structured risk taxonomy (300+ leaf-level checks) with industry overlays surfaces integration-relevant exposures — IP fragility, key-person dependence, customer concentration, systems incompatibility — at diligence, not after announcement. Quantified, severity-scored, evidence-linked.

Included in Pro+

Forensic on every target — not just the survivors.

Pre-LOI Forensic Screen on every credible inbound before you commit board time. The 90% of targets you walk away from cost you a defensible artifact, not a quarter. Beneish, EBITDA bridge, working-capital anomalies, cross-doc reconciliation.

170+ MCP tools

The strategic context is proprietary — you can’t outsource it.

OloLand MCP server callable from Claude Code, Desktop, and Cursor. 170+ tools your strategy and finance team runs themselves — the proprietary context (product roadmap, customer overlap, channel fit) never leaves your team. Bankers don’t see it.

Corp Dev Capabilities

Built for Strategic Acquirers

Synergy math the board can defend. Forensic on the target the CFO can sign off on. An institutional record that compounds across every tuck-in and transformative deal you do.

Deterministic Synergy Modeling

Revenue synergies (cross-sell math, channel overlap, pricing power) and cost synergies (G&A consolidation, procurement, facilities) modeled in deterministic engines with strict unit enforcement. Line items cite their assumption sources — your board sees the work.

Forensic QoE on the Target

Beneish M-Score, Benford’s Law, EBITDA bridge, lapping detection, and journal-entry testing. Cross-document reconciliation when source classes differ. Working-capital and revenue-quality deep dives are not included. Run pre-LOI to set price, or post-LOI as a CFO-grade screen before announcement. Methodology disclosed.

Integration Playbook from Your Last Three Tuck-ins

A persistent deal record across sourcing, pipeline, close, integration, and post-mortem. The lessons from your last three tuck-ins surface on deal #4 — what slipped in IT integration, where customer-attrition exceeded model, which synergy bucket overshot. Institutional memory you keep when the VP leaves.

Anthropic captures the session. OloLand captures the institution.

Your corporate M&A history compounds — every synergy claim measured post-close, every integration outcome captured, every lesson queryable on the next deal. The institutional record stays with the company, not with the VP who’s about to move.

Optional analytics

Help us improve the acquisition experience.

With your permission, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Cloudflare, and PostHog measure page visits and conversion paths. PostHog autocapture and session recording stay off. We do not send form contents, uploaded documents, email addresses, or phone numbers in behavioral events. This choice does not enable personalized ads or enhanced-conversion user data. Read our Privacy Policy.