Trusted AI teammates that learn from every deal
OloLand gives private-equity deal teams AI analysts whose work can be checked. Every figure links to its source, every assumption is stated, and every open question stays on the record.
You
Is the FY2024 adjusted EBITDA of $7.5M supported?
Deal lead
Partly. $7.0M is supported and $0.5M is not.
Reported EBITDA of $6.1M ties to the audited FY2024 income statement.
Management adds back $1.4M to reach $7.5M. Schedules support $0.9M of it.
$0.5M of consulting fees labelled one-time also appear in FY2022 and FY2023. No support has been provided.2
Consolidated statement of income
Year ended 31 December 2024, $ millions
| Revenue | 47.6 |
| Cost of sales | (31.4) |
| Gross profit | 16.2 |
| Operating expenses | (11.6) |
| Operating income | 4.6 |
| Depreciation and amortization, note 7 | 1.5 |
| EBITDA | 6.1 |
Add-back support
FY2024, $ millions
| Owner compensation | 0.6 | Payroll records |
| Facility relocation | 0.3 | Vendor invoices |
| Consulting fees | 0.5 | None provided |
| Supported | 0.9 |
Adjusted EBITDA bridge
FY2024, $ millions
| Reported EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Owner compensation | 0.6 |
| Facility relocation | 0.3 |
| Consulting fees, one-time3 | 0.5 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 7.5 |
1Each statement is marked known, inferred or unresolved.
2A citation opens the page it came from. Select 1, 2 or 3 in the answer to try it.
3The passage the answer relies on is highlighted.
4What cannot be supported goes onto the deal record.
The deal room, with illustrative data for a fictional company.1
The model is the analyst. OloLand is the record your team checks the analysis against, challenges, and stands behind at investment committee.
Trust
Every figure has a source you can open.
Answers cite the page they came from. Citations are checked before an answer is delivered, and one that cannot be resolved is withheld or marked unverified. When two documents disagree, both values are kept and the conflict goes to a reviewer with a recommendation by source rank. Valuations run on deterministic engines.
| Metric | CIM | Audited | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 48.2 | 47.6 | In review | |
| Recommended: $47.6M from the audited statements, the higher-ranked source. Both values are kept until a reviewer decides. | ||||
| EBITDA | 6.1 | 6.1 | Agrees | |
| Capital expenditure | 1.1 | 1.1 | Agrees | |
| Net debt | 12.3 | 12.3 | Agrees | |
Judgment
The deal’s risks and assumptions, stated in the open.
A structured taxonomy of 300+ leaf-level checks turns the data room into a risk register with findings linked to evidence. Each assumption carries a status and a history of who changed it. Approval stays a human action, and an IC package cannot be approved while a high-severity assumption is open.
| Item | Severity | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risks | |||
| Top customer is 31% of revenue | High | Open | |
| Consulting fees labelled one-time recur in three years | High | Open | |
| Year-end inventory count was not observed | Medium | Open | |
| Assumptions | |||
| FY2025 revenue grows 8% | Medium | Verified | |
| Gross margin holds at 34% | Medium | Unverified | |
| $0.5M consulting add-back is non-recurring | High | Unverified | |
| IC approval is blocked. One high-severity assumption is unverified. | |||
Learning
Each decision becomes part of your firm’s record.
The IC decision is recorded with the forecast behind it, and actuals are scored against that forecast when they arrive. Your firm’s playbook rules and risk policy run on every new deal. The record stays in your workspace and is never pooled with another firm’s.
| Deal | Year-1 EBITDA at approval | Actual | Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Alder | $9.0M | $8.4M | -6.7% | |
| Project Birch | $5.2M | $5.5M | +5.8% | |
| Project Cedar | pending | n/a | n/a | |
| Playbook rules applied to Project Cedar | ||||
| Add-backs above 15% of adjusted EBITDA | 18.7% | Flagged | ||
| Single customer above 30% of revenue | 31% | Flagged | ||
Published results, with their limits
Two evaluations, each with its methodology, cohort and per-case results on a public page. Both are small, and both say so.
10of102
Restatement Recall v1.1
Eligible SEC restatements flagged from the pre-disclosure 10-K alone, using the Beneish M-Score, the EBITDA bridge and the structured risk taxonomy.
2.7×and11.8×3
Vals AI Finance Agent v1.1, a third-party benchmark
Less run-to-run variance with OloLand’s deterministic verifier tools, on Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro respectively.
Security and governance
Stated as what the product does today. What is still in progress is marked that way.
Security in detailTrust center- Encrypted in transit and at rest
- Files and records are hosted on Google Cloud in the United States and encrypted in transit and at rest with Google-managed keys.
- One workspace, one tenant
- Every deal, document, calculation, and approval is scoped to your company workspace. Agent surfaces reach it over the same company-scoped rail.
- Not used for learning unless you opt in
- Nothing from your workspace enters a learning dataset unless a workspace admin opts in. Opted-in datasets stay per workspace and are never pooled; cross-firm model training is fail-closed.
- Approvals stay human
- Material approvals are human actions. The agent-facing rail cannot self-approve governed artifacts, whichever model or surface did the work.
- Agent runs are on the record
- Runs are recorded with provider, served model, tools called, and verdicts, and can be inspected span by span; harness runs can be replayed. A regulator export can be requested for a deal.
- SOC 2 Type II — in progress4
- The audit is in progress with Vanta. Control status is published on the trust center; nothing here is claimed as certified until the report is issued.
Built first for lower-middle-market private equity. There are also pages for independent sponsors, search funds, family offices, private credit and corporate development.
Questions teams ask first
What does OloLand do?
OloLand is an intelligence workspace for private-equity deal teams. It connects evidence, supported analytical workflows, assumptions, and review decisions so the team can inspect the basis of its investment judgment.
Does OloLand make the investment decision?
Your team owns the investment judgment. OloLand supports the work and preserves the record; governed approvals require human action.
Does every answer have complete evidence?
Evidence coverage depends on the available documents and the workflow. Review the sources and any missing information. A calculation or citation check does not establish that a conclusion is complete or correct.
Do we need to adopt the whole platform to evaluate it?
Begin with one supported workflow and a representative case. Agree on what to measure, who reviews it, and when to decide whether the evaluation warrants a next step.
Can we start without sharing a live deal?
Yes. Start with the checklist and an illustrative example. Before using confidential materials, confirm the permitted data, workspace access, and applicable terms.
Is the diagnostic an investment recommendation?
No. It helps identify gaps in a team’s evidence and review process. It does not assess a deal’s merits or replace professional diligence.
See it on a deal like yours
Notes and sources
- Product screens on this page show illustrative data for a fictional company, Project Cedar. They are not customer data.
- Restatement Recall v1.1: 10 of 10 eligible cases flagged. n=10, 95% confidence interval 72% to 100%, single seed. Methodology.
- Vals AI Finance Agent v1.1, public split: 50 of 537 questions, 3 seeds per condition, same harness, tools and judge. Variance fell 2.7× on Claude Opus 4.7 and 11.8× on Gemini 3.1 Pro; mean accuracy +3.4pt and +1.0pt. Methodology.
- The SOC 2 Type II audit is in progress. Live control status is on the trust center.